design-ux
Attractive design with a difficult enquiry journey: five UX failures to test
The site looks impressive in a presentation, but requesting an estimate requires visitors to discover the offer and guess where to click. Observe actual tasks before concluding that appearance is the problem.
The site looks impressive in a presentation, but requesting an estimate requires visitors to discover the offer and guess where to click. Observe actual tasks before concluding that appearance is the problem. An attractive experience can still conceal the service, demand unnecessary reading or interrupt submission. These are testable UX hypotheses, not evidence of a particular conversion rate.
Test five possible failures
An abstract offer: ask someone what they can buy after reading the opening. If the answer is only “innovation”, a concrete service may be missing.
Equal emphasis everywhere: several equally prominent actions can make selection difficult. Identify the page's primary task and clarify the role of alternatives.
Navigation that requires guessing: creative labels may be ambiguous. Check whether services, work and contact can be recognised without explanation.
Errors that do not support recovery: the form must identify the issue and allow correction. Try keyboard use, an invalid email and a temporary submission failure.
Motion competing with reading: important information should remain available without interaction. Hover feedback does not need to move the whole composition or cover an action.
Record behaviour rather than preference
| Task | Evidence to note |
|---|---|
| Find a specific offer | Route and confusing terminology |
| Understand the scope | Question left unanswered |
| Submit a request | Field, error and perceived confirmation |
In a hypothetical site, visitors see “digital solutions” but understand the offer only after opening another page. Naming “websites and landing pages” may improve comprehension; the journey still needs observation to assess the effect. Aesthetic preference alone does not prove lost sales.
Improve one journey before rebuilding everything
Clarify a label, answer a recurring question or repair validation. If the difficulty spans several pages, review structure, hierarchy and implementation. A redesign should preserve content, URLs, accessibility and CMS operation alongside its visual changes.
I can assess these areas through websites and landing pages, using prototypes, front-end work and form verification. For an existing application, modernisation can isolate improvements without replacing the whole system.
Bring one important task, its page and error evidence without user details. Existing metrics need a period and definition. Without them, begin with behaviour and hypotheses rather than invented percentages.
Sources and further reading
Remove friction between your offer and the form
Share a page and the action visitors should complete. I can investigate hierarchy, navigation and submission to scope verifiable UX improvements.
Remove friction between your offer and the form ↗